Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Francesca's avatar

I've been thinking about this so much! What about monogamy do I *actually want, vs what I have been taught to want? Conversely, what about nonmonogamy do I *actually want, vs what I convinced myself I wanted in a knee-jerk reaction (correction) to the pain and frustration of a longterm, monogamous relationship that ultimately failed? I think, actually, just now typing this, that my language might be part of the problem - if I am hell-bent on seeing my divorce as a "failure," then, sure, I'm probably more inclined to see its opposite (non monogamy) as the desired path. But on the other hand (and I think this is the "fluid" language referenced in the essay), the work is to remember that it is not any particular approach (monogamy or non) that holds the key to our liberation. We hold the key to our liberation - and how we choose to practice that will be different for each of us. Labels don't matter. Numbers of partners (or absence) of partners don't matter. What matters is HOW we are in relationship(s) with other(s) - and especially how we are in relationship(s) with ourself(ves)!

Expand full comment
Kris Jackson's avatar

I missed hearing from you! I was just wondering how you were doing yesterday and here you are today! Thanks for this thoughtful and thought provoking piece. Monogamy (for women) and patriarchy are very interwoven. Patriarchy breeds isolation and competition between women. Matriarchy is community driven and doesn’t leave women to fend for themselves. So, monogamy might be easier for men and women under a matriarchal society, because needs are addressed by the community and not in isolation where only one person can and is supposed to meet the needs of another.

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts